One of the many
pearls I picked up during my exploration into the field of psychology was the
concept of Cognitive dissonance. The term was coined by Leon Festinger in his
1956 book When Prophecy Fails, as he
chronicled the followers of a UFO cult as reality clashed with their fervent
belief in an impending apocalypse. The short version is: dissonance occurs when we hold conflicting
ideas, beliefs, or are faced with inconsistent values or emotions. The theory proposes that people are motivated
to reduce this ‘distress’ by either altering existing cognitions (I’ll say
attitudes), adding new ones to create a consistent belief system, or
alternatively reduce the importance of one of the conflicting elements. An example given during my studies was that
of smoking. A smoker wants to smoke,
knows it’s unhealthy but then argues the negative consequences are remote, or
won’t occur. Yes, some would call that a
state of denial. The key reason for bringing
this up is that the dissonance theory warns that people have a bias toward
consonance in cognitions.
According to
Festinger, we engage in a process he called ‘dissonance reduction’ and said it
could be achieved in one of three ways: (1) lowering the importance of one of
the discordant factors; (2) adding consonant elements (as in agreements), or (3)
changing one of the dissonant factors (as in importance). The desire or bias of this disposition sheds
light on why we so often see irrational and even destructive behaviors by those
we care for in the face of facts that are undeniable (most times about dating,
but there are a host of others). I’ve
often scratched my head muttering to myself, ‘how could someone who is rather
bright in ordinary situations be so blind to the overwhelming evidence contrary
to their stance?”.
I recall
reading a profound observation by Marianne Willamson when she was speaking on the
values represented in A Course on
Miracles.
“Our greatest fear is not that we are inadequate, but
that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that
frightens us. We ask ourselves, who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, handsome,
talented, and fabulous? Actually, who are you not to be? You are a child of
God. Your playing small does not serve the world. There is nothing enlightened
about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you. We were
born to make manifest the glory of God within us. It is not just in some; it is
in everyone. And, as we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other
people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our fear, our
presence automatically liberates others."- Marianne Williamson,
A good friend
of mine recently considered my speculations on how was it we were able to
accomplish all of the self assigned tasks and not go crazy? She replied,
"We are able to take on more than we could have ever imagined. And it is my knowledge of that ability that restores my faith every time I second guess myself and think I can't do something."
Something else too. I can liberate myself from pervasive recrimination. ON those occasions when I fail to abide to strict, inflexible adherence to a demand-contrived schedule for deliverance and I am in conflict with desires, (dissonance) I am alert to those competing contradictions framed in 'time'. I let me off the hook with the phrase 'for now.' I cannot do all of what I wish at one time. I can do some, or even one...right now. As for the rest? I'll see about it.
Something else too. I can liberate myself from pervasive recrimination. ON those occasions when I fail to abide to strict, inflexible adherence to a demand-contrived schedule for deliverance and I am in conflict with desires, (dissonance) I am alert to those competing contradictions framed in 'time'. I let me off the hook with the phrase 'for now.' I cannot do all of what I wish at one time. I can do some, or even one...right now. As for the rest? I'll see about it.

No comments:
Post a Comment