One day it’s just different.
Change can be both bold and subtle, or perhaps it’s our
attention to shifting degrees that is so distracted. As a child I would
wonder at the formation and dissipation of clouds. But to witness them,
you had to focus your attention; you had to be still. Much like autumn's
colorful transitions, it can go unnoticed until significant collection of
change is indisputable. Nature doesn't ask permission.
So often, I've
heard, when in discussion "That's what I believe" as the consummate
respond to competing opinions. I've spent some time dissembling the
notion of belief, in order to see how it ticks. When I was younger, on
impulse of liken wondering, I took to the task of cracking the case and
getting into the guts of our family telephone. I was very proud of my
ability to get it apart and down to its most primary components without
having to resort to violent efforts; as in destroying the design in my
quest. My mother, on the other hand, was not amused, nor nearly as
delighted as I. She did not hesitate or candy coat threat in the
least that suffering would be my lot if I did not get the phone put back
together by the time my father got home from work. With the
exception of a few spare screws, all was reassembled by the time he
arrived; lucky me.
Back to belief:
As is commonly accepted, our thoughts are supported by
emotions, and so are referred to as feelings. Now, I'm not going to
try and awe or beguile with some institutional study to curry ...um...belief.
But, what seems to be the case, in my opinion, is that we sort of do that
internally with just about every living moment. We have an experience,
and at the core of it are collected facts. The house burned, the horse
jumped, the ice cream fell to the ground; the phone is apart. Facts: Some
of the time, they are undeniably 'true' Yup, that the phone unit is now
in its multitude of parts. Where we get ourselves off track from actual,
is our irresistible, and mostly reflex, nature to conveyance from event
to belief.
"You better
believe there will be hell to pay when your dad gets home if it is NOT put back
together"
That, is an
assumption. A strong motivator if I am to agree with the premise, but still,
nothing leads me to 'believe' that it is so but my own conviction from past
experience, that the statement is a 'fact' and not an assumption; that is, pop
will have a hormonal episode when called to attention of my antics. When
I believe the construction of facts and fiction to be the truth, then I have
the beginnings of faith; a strong belief.
Obviously some
belief's are harmless enough, such as the sun will come up, or that our job
will be there tomorrow. Well, that is until you walk into the company to
be called to the office and be surprised with dismissal. Then, that
belief is challenged, and oft as not, an emotional response occurs,
"I thought I was doing a good
job" (but it was really a belief fashioned out of selective facts and
cooked into a concept.) Or as in the phone example, I believed that
threat of beating was imminently predictable if I did not perform in a
certain way. Why? Well, because we place our faith in our ability to
predict the truth from our past. Or another way of looking at it is, we
assume the way we assemble our collection of facts to be true; which leads us
to belief; then attach our faith into that conclusion. Why do we do all
of this?
In the survival of
our species, it was necessary to develop a keen sense of predicting. We
were not as fast as our predators, nor did we have weapons adequate to provide
survival once caught. But we did have a brain that could reason, and
possessed a good memory too boot. Over time we developed a method of discerning
our environment with all of its implications; doing this
revealed something amazing, something other animals could not, and that
was projecting facts into possibilities.
"If I
walk out during the middle of the day, in the open to the water hole, I am
vulnerable. I wonder if I did that at night if my chances of
surviving would increase?"
As eon's shaped and
honed this ability, we discovered a trust in those skills to help us survive. As
it is now, experience, personal knowledge, encourages what we refer to
as trust. As we continue to trust our experience, we create this
belief that we 'know' and so have faith in our past. Left unchecked or
dismissing evidence to the contrary, we develop a predication, where we
will continue to obtain the same results if we do things the same way.
That is the root of our traditions and rituals of most of our religions.
Obtaining the same results by following a script dictated not by response to
current facts, but reliance on past results ~ denying if you
will, the influence of present facts in order to obtain
the desired same state, which of course was based on other facts; is
wishful thinking. Sages over the ages have warned us of such
practice. Claiming a superior state is to not become attached to
our sensations. There is a caution to not haphazardly assign
experience as truth. Mostly, we shape assumptions from our evidence,
thereby by extension, go 'jumping to conclusions'. This is a false reliance on our ability to
collect, and process pertinent facts. But like all things, do so really
depends on attention to those details that are being revealed. The summer
sky, the autumn leaves, the telephone examples are varying degrees of applied
attention to change, as well as the subtle application of
assumptions.
Speculation is fine
for problem solving, weighing options is healthy. But for a course of action
its nothing more than creating a fanciful belief system. It is a poor substitution to believe
as 'truth' in place of facts in an ever changing world. It is
as if driving with eyes tightly shut muttering, "so far, so
good....so far...so good"



















































